The court allowed the modification petition to rectify a clerical error in a previous order, substituting Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. for the erroneously typed Section 482(2) Cr.P.C. The petition was then disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74533 of 2023
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50189 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2020 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada
====================================================== KUNAL CHAUHAN @ KUNDAN CHAUHAN SON OF SUBHASH CHAUHAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - BHALUA, P.S. - BELA, DISTRICT - GAYA
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ratnakar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
modification of the order dated 12.05.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.50189 of 2022.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74533 of 2023(2) dt.01-12-2023 2/2
read in place of Section 482(2) Cr.P.C.”
No.50189 of 2022 is modified to the aforesaid extent only. The
other parts of the order shall remain intact.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Sanjay/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the typographical error of recording Section 482(2) Cr.P.C. instead of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. in a prior order requires correction.
Whether the modification petition should be disposed of.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Kunal Chauhan @ Kundan Chauhan
The State of Bihar
Shobha Devi
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
