Allowed

Kumar Vibhor @ Vibhor v. Union of India through CBI

Patna HC22 Jun 2023CR. MISC./7415/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner facing charges under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC, relying on Supreme Court precedents regarding CBI investigations and the petitioner's cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail upon surrender within six weeks, furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Kumar Vibhor @ Vibhor Vs Union of India through CBI — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7415 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2019 Thana- C.B.I CASE - TR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KUMAR VIBHOR @ VIBHOR S/o Late Ravi Shankar Mehra R/o Mahavidya Sadan, Lane no. 4, Vishnupuri, Chitkohra Police Station, Gardanibag and Distt- Patna. Present resident of Maa Devi Guest House, New Market, Near Patna Junction, P.S.- Kotwali, Distt- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

Union of India through CBI Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avinash Chandra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, Sr. Adv. : Mr. Lalan Kumar, Adv.

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 22-06-2023 Learned senior counsel for the C.B.I. has filed a

¶15

counter affidavit in the present case.

¶16

Let it be kept on the record.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned senior counsel for the C.B.I.

¶18

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

¶19

As per the prosecution case, 23 loans aggregating Rs.444.000/- Lakh sanctioned to various parties; fake and bogus financial statements were prepared and certified by Mr. Vijay Kumar C.A. It is further alleged that some unknown persons and the middleman viz. Mr. Vibhor (petitioner and others person connived and dishonestly cheated an amount of Rs.444.000/-

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7415 of 2023(3) dt.22-06-2023 2/3

¶21

lakhs to the Bank on the basis of fake and bogus financial statements submitted on the names of the non-existing firms.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is only a staff of the chartered account Mr. Vijay Kumar Yadav. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner. He further submits that during the investigation the petitioner has given his full cooperation to the investigating authority during the investigation. He further submits that after investigation C.B.I. has filed a charge-sheet but the C.B.I. is not required to custodian interrogation against the petitioner. He relies upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in the case of ‘ Mahdoom Bava versus Central Bureau of Investigation’ reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 299 and in the case of ‘Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another’ reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 . He further submits that total 23 persons were sanctioned loan and out of them only 9 has not paid the loan amount. He submits that petitioner has got three criminal antecedents in similar nature as stated in para3 of the bail application.

¶23

Learned counsel for the C.B.I. opposes for prayer for

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7415 of 2023(3) dt.22-06-2023 3/3

¶25

bail and submits that the petitioner is the main accused in the present case. In para-12 of the counter affidavit he stated that the petitioner has prepared forged document on that basis the loan was granted to the persons. He fairly submits that during the inquiry, the petitioner was not arrested in this case.

¶26

Considering the ratio laid down in Mahdoom Bava (supra) case and Satender Kumar Antil (supra) case and the fact that charge-sheet is submitted and petitioner has cooperated in the investigation and the CBI has not arrested the petitioner during the entire investigation, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with FIR vide CBI/EOW/Ranchi 0932019S0002 dated 11.01.2019 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶27

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶28

ajay/-

¶29

U T

Kumar Vibhor @ Vibhor v. Union of India through CBI

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumar Vibhor @ Vibhor v. Union of India through CBI

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mishri Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bharat Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Byar @ Santosh Byar Vs The State of Bihar

Devendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kumar Vibhor @ Vibhor Vs Union of India through CBI