This oral order granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of rape, requiring surrender within six weeks and furnishing a bond with sureties, subject to CrPC Section 438(2) conditions.
Petitioner to be released on bail upon surrender within six weeks by furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 and two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7332 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1194 Year-2021 Thana- PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPurnia
======================================================
MUBARAK HUSSAIN S/o Abdul Mannan Resident Of village- Dangraha Ghat, P.S.- Baisi, Distt- Purnia.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Md. Helal Ahmad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Naushad Akhtar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.1194/2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 323, 504, 506 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
Accusation against the petitioner is of committing rape upon the complainant.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that petitioner has got no criminal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7332 of 2023(3) dt.04-07-2023 2/3
antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that the complainant has filed this complaint case against the petitioner with a view to pressurize him to marry her. It is submitted that the complainant is major. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the complainant is aged about 22 years and she was consenting party in sexual relation and, as such, no offence is made out against the petitioner under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Mandar Deepak Pawar vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr., passed in Criminal Appeal No.442 of 2022.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P. No.2 fairly submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, let petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7332 of 2023(3) dt.04-07-2023 3/3
Magistrate, 1st Class, Purnia in connection with Complaint Case No.1194/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
S.KUMAR/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with offenses under Sections 376, 323, 504, 506 and 120(B) of the IPC.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mandar Deepak Pawar vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr., Criminal Appeal No.442 of 2022Explained¶16
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Mubarak Hussain
The State of Bihar
Sarina Khatoon
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
