Allowed

Om Prakash Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Nov 2023CR. MISC./72957/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A bail order granting the privilege of bail to a petitioner in judicial custody accused of offences under the Arms Act. The Court imposed conditions including appearing before the trial court fortnightly and refraining from tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount, subject to specified conditions of appearance and good behavior.

Om Prakash Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72957 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2023 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

OM PRAKASH YADAV Son of Awadhesh Yadav R/o vill - Barka, Rajpur, P.S. - Simri, Distt.- Buxar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bharat Bhushan, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 22-11-2023

¶12

Heard the parties.

¶13

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 216 of 2023 for the offence punishable under Section 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act lodged on 25.6.2023 by the informant, Lalbabu Singh.

¶14

As per the prosecution story, the police upon information that accused persons are selling wine, raided the house, in course whereof, 6.480 liters of foreign liquor was recovered as also upon further search, single barrel gun was found kept under the cow dung cakes. Accordingly, the FIR.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that two recoveries, two FIRs relating to recovery of wine/gun clearly show how the police has implicated him. Further, it is a joint house and the allegation cannot be attributed to him particularly

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72957 of 2023(2) dt.22-11-2023 2/3

¶17

when the recovery is under the cow dung cakes.

¶18

Learned APP opposes the prayer stating that the recovery is from his house.

¶19

Taking into account the aforesaid fact as also that he is in custody since 25.6.2023 (para-9 of the petition) and so far as the criminal antecedent part is concerned, it arises of the same recovery/seizure, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of bail with conditions.

¶20

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 216 of 2023 subject to the following conditions:

¶21

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his bona fide;

¶22

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

¶23

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72957 of 2023(2) dt.22-11-2023 3/3

¶25

attendance;

¶26

(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

¶27

(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶28

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application

is allowed.

(Rajiv Roy, J)

Ravi/-

U T

Om Prakash Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Om Prakash Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs M/S Prabhat Zarda Factory Ltd.

Kanika Vs The Bihar Public Service Commission

Upendra Rai @ Upendra Vs the State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Rupesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar