Allowed

Om Prakash Mahto @ Om Prakash v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Nov 2023CR. MISC./71193/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner convicted in a liquor-related prosecution. Finding no recovery from his possession and noting co-accused bail, the court directed release on furnishing bonds and sureties subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 437(3) CrPC conditions.

Om Prakash Mahto @ Om Prakash Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71193 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2022 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Om Prakash Mahto @ Om Prakash, Son Of Kari Mahto, Resident Of Village - Madhutol, Ward No.10, P.S. - Khanpur, District - Samastipur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 08-11-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 77 of 2022 registered on 01.03.2022 for the alleged offences under Sections 30(a), 32(iii), 36 and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

As per prosecution case, police received secret information about transportation of liquor in a container truck in which the petitioner and co-accused Dileep Roy had been bringing illicit liquor in huge quantity. In followup to the information, the container was intercepted but its driver fled away on seeing the police party. From the container total 2637.00 litres of India made foreign liquor was made.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71193 of 2023(2) dt.08-11-2023 2/3

¶17

petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the seized vehicle. No recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The seized liquor does not belong to this petitioner. The police falsely implicated the petitioner in this case because of his criminal antecedent. Co-accused Dileep Roy has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.04.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8120 of 2023. The petitioner is in custody since 04.08.2023 and charge-sheet has been submitted.

¶18

Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail submitting that the petitioner is a habitual offender and is accused in three cases of similar nature. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has got criminal antecedent of three cases and he is on bail in one case and petition for bail is pending in two cases.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the fact that no recovery has been shown from the conscious possession of the petitioner who was not apprehended from the spot and also considering the period of custody of the petitioner along with submission of charge-sheet, the petitioner above

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71193 of 2023(2) dt.08-11-2023 3/3

¶21

named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Court ExciseI, Samastipur/concerned court in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 77 of 2022, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also the following conditions :

¶22

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶23

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶24

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶25

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶26

balmukund/-

¶27

U T

Om Prakash Mahto @ Om Prakash v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Om Prakash Mahto @ Om Prakash v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Teju Yadav @ Tej Narayan Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Kumar @ Jelar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Balak Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Naresh Sah @ Ram Naresh Sah @ Rameshwar Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar