The High Court at Patna granted regular bail to the petitioner in PS Case No. 83 of 2019 for offences under Sections 413 read with 34 and 414 IPC, fixing bail conditions after hearing counsel for both parties.
Enlarge the petitioner on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the Court concerned, Muzaffarpur West.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71046 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2019 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Ravi Kumar S/O Anil Sahni R/O Village- Lakshmipur, P.S- Kudhni (Turki O.P), Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 05-04-2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to
remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kudhni P.S. Case No. 83 of 2019 dated 17.02.2019 registered for the offences punishable u/s 413 and 414 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the prosecution case, on seeing the police, three miscreants boarded on a motorcycle started fleeing away but the driver of the said motorcycle was arrested who disclosed his name as Dipu Kumar. The apprehended co-accused Dipu Kumar also disclosed the name of the petitioner and the coaccused person Mantosh Kumar Sahni who fled away from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71046 of 2022(2) dt.05-04-2023 2/2
there.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 07.09.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 15321 of 2020. The petitioner is accused in three other criminal cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 27.06.2022.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Muzaffarpur West in connection with Kudhni P.S. Case No. 83 of 2019.
The application stands allowed.
atul/-
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 413 read with 34 and Section 414 IPC.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
RAVI KUMAR
THE STATE OF BIHAR
CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
