This is an oral order granting anticipatory bail to an applicant apprehending arrest in a case involving assault and grievous hurt allegations, subject to specific conditions.
Grants anticipatory bail subject to surrender within six weeks and furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70011 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-421 Year-2023 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna
======================================================
RAHUL RANJAN @ RAHUL KUMAR SON OF SHAMBHU PRASAD RESIDENT OF RUPASPUR JALALPUR, KELA BAGAN, DHANAUT, P.S. - RUPASPUR, DISTRICT - PATNA, PIN-801506
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anshuman For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
2 01-11-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70011 of 2023(2) dt.01-11-2023 2/3
his head which is simple in nature and stitched wound indicates that the wound is existing prior to present occurrence. He further submits that aforesaid injury is nothing but only fabrication as the allegation of causing injury is not supported by injury report. In the light of given facts and circumstances of the case, no offence is made out under sections 341, 323, 354(b), 307 and 379/34 of the IPC. He further submits that there is delay of two days in lodging the FIR without any plausible explanation. He further submits that the dispute arose on account of parking of scooty which is clearly manifested from the perusal of FIR itself. Pragmatically and prudently, it can not be denied that in trifle matter, though some occurrences have been occurred on alleged date but petitioner is not in any way associated with the said occurrence as alleged in the FIR. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70011 of 2023(2) dt.01-11-2023 3/3
record, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M 1st Danapur Patna, in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 421/23, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
asmit/alok-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with the FIR complaints under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 307, and 379/34 of the IPC?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rahul Ranjan @ Rahul Kumar
The State of Bihar
Alok Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
