Allowed

Vakil Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jan 2023CR. MISC./68587/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners charged with offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC, likely related to a forged certificate issued to obtain a teacher's job. Bail was conditional on removal of defects within three weeks and furnishing a bond.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail by furnishing bond of Rs.25,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount and removal of defects within three weeks.

Vakil Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66404 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-532 Year-2021 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sushil Kumar Ram Son Of Sripati Ram R/O Village- Sohara, P.S.- Barahara, District- Bhojpur (BIHAR)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ======================================================

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 68587 of 2022

¶10

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-532 Year-2021 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhojpur

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Vakil Prasad S/O Raj Kishore Ram Resident Of Village- Gyanpur (Baluchauk), P.S.- Badhara, District- Bhojpur, Ara

¶13

Deepak Kumar Ram S/O Jainath Ram Resident Of Village- Bharauli, P.S.Shahpur, District- Bhojpur, Ara.

¶14

... ... Petitioner/s

¶15

Versus

¶16

The State of Bihar

¶17

Department of Vigilance Bihar

¶18

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶19

======================================================

¶20

Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 66404 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nagendra Upadhyay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 For the Vigilance Mr. Rana Vikram Singh (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 68587 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukul Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Mishra

¶21

======================================================

¶22

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

2 17-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶25

As both these bail applications have cropped up from

¶26

the same police station case number, hence, with consent of parties, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to

¶28

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66404 of 2022(2) dt.17-01-2023 2/3

¶29

remove the defects, if any, within three weeks.

¶30

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶31

Petitioners are said to have got job on the post of Block Teacher on the basis of forged certificate.

¶32

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that petitioners were selected and appointed on the post of Primary Teacher after duly process and verification of their academic documents. He submits that the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 66404 of 2022 was not appointed on the said post on the basis of forged certificate and petitioners in Cr. Misc. No. 68587 of 2022 have themselves resigned from their service. He further submits that petitioners has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

¶33

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

¶34

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

¶35

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66404 of 2022(2) dt.17-01-2023 3/3

¶36

bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 532 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶37

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶38

devendra/-

¶39

U T

Vakil Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vakil Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rikesh Kumar Singh @ Rakesh Singh @ Shethi Vs the State of Bihar

Praveen Kumar @ Vicky Vs The State of Bihar

Jawahar Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar

Birendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Puri Vs the State of Bihar

Raghubir Singh Vs The State of Bihar