Respondent sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging extortion and threatening under IPC Sections 386, 506, and 34. The petitioners claimed false implication and ownership dispute regarding the land involved. The High Court rejected the bail application considering the gravity of the offence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66046 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-659 Year-2021 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East
Champaran
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Madhurendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 18-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66046 of 2023(2) dt.18-10-2023 2/2
anay/-
U T
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 386, 506, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code should be allowed.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Sakal Mishra @ Sakal Mishra
Roj Mohammad
Latif Mian
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
