Allowed

Praduman Kumar Gond @ Praduman Kumar Gon v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Oct 2023CR. MISC./65992/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarthy allowed the regular bail petition of the petitioner, who was in custody since 26.07.2023, in a case registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

What did the court decide?

enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the Special Excise Court-II, Siwan.

Praduman Kumar Gond @ Praduman Kumar Gon Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65992 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2022 Thana- NAUTAN District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PRADUMAN KUMAR GOND @ PRADUMAN KUMAR GON S/O OM PRAKASH GOND @ OM PRAKASH GOD R/O VILLAGE- CHITMATH, PS. MAIRWA, DIST. SIWAN

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 18-10-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this application for

¶13

grant of regular bail in connection with Nautan P.S. Case no.74 of 2022 registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, the informant states that he received information about the three accused persons including the petitioner herein having hidden liquor in the bushes. On search, 306 litres of liquor was recovered.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that neither any recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner nor from his house. The alleged recovery is from a public place accessible to all. The cause of

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65992 of 2023(2) dt.18-10-2023 2/2

¶17

false implication of the petitioner is his antecedent. He is in custody since 26.7.2023 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶18

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation in the FIR, the petitioner being in custody since 26.7.2023 and grant of bail to similarly situated coaccused, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Nautan P.S. Case no. 74 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Excise Court-II, Siwan.

¶20

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶21

Bibhash

¶22

U T

Praduman Kumar Gond @ Praduman Kumar Gon v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Praduman Kumar Gond @ Praduman Kumar Gon v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanhaiya Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Police Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Panchu Ansari Vs the State of Bihar

Sanni Kumar @ Sunni Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Punam Debi @ Sano Debi Vs the State of Bihar

Munna Yadav Vs The State of Bihar