Petitioner withdrew a bail petition which became infructuous as he had already been enlarged on bail by the court under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. Request allowed and petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64247 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2020 Thana- CHANDRADIP District- Jamui
======================================================
NIKKU KUMAR @ SHASHI BHUSHAN YADAV S/o Saudagar Yadav R/vBhaluana, P.S.- Chandradeep, District- Jamui
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER
2 21-02-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
parties.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present bail petition for the reason that now it become infructuous, as petitioner enlarged on bail under Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Request allowed.
Accordingly, the present bail petition stands dismissed
as withdrawn having become infructuous.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
S.Katyayan/-
U T
NIKKU KUMAR @ SHASHI BHUSHAN YADAV
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Chandra Shekhar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
