Petitioner sought permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application under PS. Case No.-107 of 2016. The court accorded permission, leading to the dismissal of the application as withdrawn by the petitioner.
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application was accorded; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61947 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2016 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur
======================================================
JAI MANGAL SAHNI S/o- YOGENDRA SAHNI Village- Pachabhidava Datapur urf Pach Bhinda Bakhra Ps- Saraiya Dist- Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Rajpati, Advocate Mr. Keshav Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 29-11-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
to withdraw this present anticipatory bail application.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail
application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
Gautam/-
U T
Jai Mangal Sahni
The State of Bihar
Chandra Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
