Allowed

Sikandar Kumar Sahni @ Sikindra Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Jan 2023CR. MISC./60889/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to a petitioner accused of manufacturing illicit liquor under the IPC and Bihar Excise Act. The court considered that the petitioner was not apprehended at the spot, no recovery was made from him, and the charge sheet had been filed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties to the Exclusive Special Excise Court, Muzaffarpur.

Sikandar Kumar Sahni @ Sikindra Sahni Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60889 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2021 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sikandar Kumar Sahni @ Sikindra Sahni S/O Ram Babu Sahani Resident of Village- Dahrpur, P.S.- Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Sharda Kumari, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 04-01-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Minapur P.S.Case No. 61 of 2021 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 272, 273, 414, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a)/33 of the Bihar Prohibition Act and Excise Act.

¶15

As per prosecution case, police received secret information about petitioner and other co-accused persons manufacturing illicit liquor from spirit and packing the same in bottles. A raid was conducted on the house of co-accused Mahichand Sahni and his co-accused son Arvind Kumar was apprehended from the spot when he tried to flee away. From the house of the apprehended co-accused recovery of 107.20 litres

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60889 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023 2/3

¶17

of India made foreign liquor and 60 litres of spirit were made. Further recovery of 54 litres of India made foreign liquor was also made from a vehicle parked in the house of the co-accused. Stickers and other articles used in manufacturing and packing of the illicit liquor were also recovered from the spot.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and nothing incriminating has been recovered from his conscious possession. The petitioner has been named in this case on the basis of statement of co-accused, but the said statement has got no legal sanctity and naming this petitioner on the basis of secret information is merely high-handedness of the police. Learned counsel further submits that recovery has been made from the possession of the co-accused persons and no recovery has been made from this petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 23.06.2022 and charge sheet has been submitted.

¶19

Learned APP vehemently opposes the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners. Learned APP submits that petitioner has got long criminal history and is accused in a large number of cases of similar nature.

¶20

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60889 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023 3/3

¶22

fact that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and no recovery has been shown from him and further considering the period of custody of the petitioner and submission of chargesheet against him, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1, Muzaffarpur in connection with Minapur P.S.Case No. 61 of 2021, subject to the following conditions :

¶23

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶24

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶25

(iii) In case of absence for three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶26

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶27

himanshu/-

¶28

U T

Sikandar Kumar Sahni @ Sikindra Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sikandar Kumar Sahni @ Sikindra Sahni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Akhilesh Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Amarnath Bhakat @ Amarnath Bhagat @ Pappu Bhakt @ Pappu Bhagat Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Mukul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar