Dismissed

Rupesh Yadav @ Rupesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Feb 2023CR. MISC./60790/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the Patna High Court rejected an application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner was apprehending arrest in a robbery case under Section 392 IPC, alleging false implicate. The Court declined bail but offered a one-time view on regular bail upon surrender.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; conditional direction for consideration of regular bail upon surrender within six weeks.

Rupesh Yadav @ Rupesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60790 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2019 Thana- SIKANDRA District- Jamui

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RUPESH YADAV @ RUPESH KUMAR SON OF AASHO YADAV R/O VILLAGE- POHE, P.S.- SIKANDRA, DISTT.- JAMUI

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 23-02-2023

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

¶13

Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons is said to have assaulted the informant and looted his motor-cycle.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. He submits that one person was apprehended by the police who disclosed the name of the petitioner that the petitioner is also involved in this case. He further submits that there is no any

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60790 of 2022(2) dt.23-02-2023 2/2

¶16

incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

¶17

Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail application and submitted that the allegation levelled as the petitioner is serious in nature. Hence, he does not deserve anticipatory bail.

¶18

Considering the nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Sikandra P.S. Case No. 146/2019. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.

¶19

However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today and seeks regular bail, the learned Court below would pass the order, preferably, on the same day, without being prejudiced by this order considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent..

¶20

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶21

ajay/-

¶22

U T

Rupesh Yadav @ Rupesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rupesh Yadav @ Rupesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurucharan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Golu Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Arman Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Lal Babu Yadav @ Lal Babu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Chandra Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Prabeen Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar