Allowed

Bablu Singh @ Vijay Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Aug 2023CR. MISC./5999/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to Bablu Singh in a case involving Sections 498A and 323 IPC, subject to furnishing a bail bond within six weeks and appearing before the trial court. The order allows the informant to approach the court to cancel the bail if facts are incorrect.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail subject to surrender within six weeks, filing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, and satisfying conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Bablu Singh @ Vijay Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5999 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BABLU SINGH @ VIJAY SINGH SON OF SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH R/O VILLAGE- RASSAULI, P.S.- HASAN BAZAR, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR (ARA)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

BINDI KUMARI D/O LATE LALAN SINGH R/O VILLAGE- RAMPUR MATHIYA, P.O.- NAYA BHOJPUR, P.S.- SIMARI, DISTRICT- BUXAR

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 23-08-2023 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 341, 379, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by order dated 18.05.2023, notices were issued on O.P. No. 2 and the same was filed within time. It is next submitted that from perusal of office report, it would manifest that the notices have been received by the mother and brother of the O.P. No. 2.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5999 of 2023(4) dt.23-08-2023 2/3

¶16

the O.P. No. 2 is residing with her mother and brother and she will not come to contest the case. It is next submitted that petitioner and the O.P. No. 2 have filed a Divorce Suit No. 94 of 2021 seeking divorce by mutual consent which is pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Buxar.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the evidence of the petitioner has been recorded in the said divorce proceedings and the evidence of the informant is awaited. It is next submitted that parties agreed that for separating, the petitioner will pay an amount of Rs. 2,70,000/- to the O.P. No. 2 by way of permanent alimony. It is further submitted that out of Rs. 2,70,000/-, the petitioner has already paid an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- and the day the evidence of the O.P. No. 2 is recorded, the rest amount shall be paid.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5999 of 2023(4) dt.23-08-2023 3/3

¶21

each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Baxar Mahila P.S. Case No. 10 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

However, it is made clear that the informant would be at liberty to file an application seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail order of the petitioner in the event if what has been contended by the petitioner, as recorded hereinabove, are incorrect facts.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

Rishabh/-

¶25

U T

Bablu Singh @ Vijay Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bablu Singh @ Vijay Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaushal Kishore Singh @ Sippi Vs the State of Bihar

Mani Bhusan Chaubey @ Manee Bhushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prakash Kumar Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Parshuram Chaudhary @ Prashuram Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar

Maya Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Anil Kumar @ Anil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar