Permission was accorded to the petitioner to withdraw its quashing application, which was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the quashing application was accorded; the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58948 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2012 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya
======================================================
The State Of Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
A.P.P. for the State.
seeks permission to withdraw the quashing application.
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
THE STATE OF BIHAR
RAM SWAROOP PASWAN
MAJHAR BHUIYA
SUBHASH PASWAN
SUDAMA PASWAN
SATYAVRAT VERMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
