Allowed

Dilip Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Apr 2023CR. MISC./57866/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, a resident of Muzaffarpur, in a case involving the possession of suspected Ganja under the NDPS Act. The court noted the quantity recovered was less than the commercial quantity and proceedings were lenient due to the petitioner's clean antecedents and jail duration.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Dilip Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57866 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2022 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DILIP KUMAR Son of Jagranath Paswan Resident of Village - Goriyara, P.s.Karja, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 06-04-2023

¶11

Let the defect(s), if any, pointed out by the office be removed within four weeks from the date of this order, failing which the matter be listed again under the appropriate heading for necessary action.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 187 of 2022, dated 17.07.2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act.

¶14

As per the prosecution, police personnel on secret information raided the alleged house, apprehended this petitioner and a co-accused and recovered in total 2 Kg 280

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57866 of 2022(4) dt.06-04-2023 2/3

¶16

gram of contraband suspected to be Ganja from the alleged house and the said house belong to this petitioner.

¶17

The main submissions advanced by petitioner’s counsel are that as per the FIR 2.280 kg narcotic material suspected to be Ganja was recovered from the house of this petitioner which is lesser than the commercial quantity and the same has not been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner and during the course of search and seizure, mandatory provisions of section 50 of the NDPS Act has not been followed and there is no independent witness of the search and seizure rather they are the official persons. Further submission is that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 18.07.2022 and he has fair and clean antecedent.

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶19

Considering the above submissions and mainly the petitioner’s custody period and the seizure list of the alleged seized contraband goes to show that the main witnesses of the seizure are police personnel, in my opinion a lenient approach can be taken in respect of the petitioner’s prayer for bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57866 of 2022(4) dt.06-04-2023 3/3

¶21

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 187 of 2022.

¶22

(Shailendra Singh, J)

¶23

maynaz/- U T

Dilip Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Om Prakash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Maqsood @ MD Maqsood Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Ray @ Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sikandar Kumar @ Sikandar Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar