Allowed

Sikendra Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Nov 2023CR. MISC./55457/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Held that the petitioner, apprehending arrest in a mining case, shall be released on bail on furnishing surety bonds upon surrender within thirty days, subject to standard conditions including cooperation in trial and verification of antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail upon surrender within 30 days by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Sikendra Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55457 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2022 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SIKENDRA KUMAR SON OF KAMATA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SHEIKHPURA PS BARUN DIST AURANGABAD

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 08-11-2023

¶14

Heard Mr. Binod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for

¶15

the petitioner and Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, learned APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 284 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 06.07.2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 4 and 21 of MMDR Act, 1957 and also Rules 11, 43 of Bihar Minerals Act, 2019 and Rule 56 of the Bihar Minerals Amendment Act, 2021 and Section 15 of the Environment Protection Act, 1986..

¶17

Allegation against the petitioner is of illegal mining, storing and supplying of sand at Dhamni Ghat at the Bank of Sone river and during the raid several vehicles i.e. trucks, cars, bikes and including the petitioner’s bike was found there and seeing

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55457 of 2023(3) dt.08-11-2023 2/3

¶19

the raiding party the owners of the aforesaid vehicles fled away from the spot.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedents and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and in fact the motorcycle seized by the prosecution, the petitioner is the valid owner of the seized motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR 26K-9256 and he had produced the certificate registration which suggests that the motorcycle in question is registered in the name of the petitioner. He further submits that the other co-accused person namely Vinod Kumar has been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.01.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 61631 of 2022.

¶21

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. Aurangabad in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 284 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55457 of 2023(3) dt.08-11-2023 3/3

¶24

438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions :-

¶25

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶26

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶27

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶28

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶29

Ibrar//-

¶30

U T

Sikendra Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sikendra Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Kumar @ Swaminathan Brijwala @ Swaminath Brijwala Vs The State of Bihar

Jogendra Chaudhary @ Jogindra Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Ekwal Sahni Vs the State of Bihar

Mithilesh Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Manorama Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Sagar Rai Vs the State of Bihar