Allowed

Yugal Yadav @ Yugal Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jan 2023CR. MISC./55095/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This case involved an anticipatory bail application by three accused persons facing charges of cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The Patna High Court allowed the application upon the informant's affidavit stating that the petitioner had returned the amount, releasing the petitioner on bail with conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is released on bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, within four weeks in connection with PS Case No. 229/

Yugal Yadav @ Yugal Prasad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55095 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2019 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. YUGAL YADAV @ YUGAL PRASAD YADAV Son of Late Huro Yadav R/V- Near Yadav Niwas,Pipradih, P.S- Jhajha Dist- Jamui

¶5

Shyam Kishore Bharti Son of Yugal Yadav @ Yugal Prasad Yadav R/V- Near Yadav Niwas,Pipradih, P.S- Jhajha Dist- Jamui

¶6

Rakesh Ranjan Son of Yugal Yadav @ Yugal Prasad Yadav R/V- Near Yadav Niwas,Pipradih, P.S- Jhajha Dist- Jamui

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 11-01-2023

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the informant is also present.

¶11

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 229/2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Learned counsel for the informant has appeared and filed an affidavit sworn by the informant. In the affidavit, it has been stated that the petitioner has returned the amount to the informant and the informant has no other grievance.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55095 of 2022(4) dt.11-01-2023 2/2

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application is allowed.

¶15

Accordingly, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Smt. Neha Tripathi learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Jamui in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 229/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶16

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶17

Sunnykr/-

¶18

Yugal Yadav @ Yugal Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yugal Yadav @ Yugal Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Naim @ Md. Naeem Vs Badrul Hassan Ali @ Badrul Hasan

Kameshwar Singh Vs Upendra Singh

Harvindra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Himanshu Shekhar Vs the State of Bihar

Samar Raj @ Monu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar