Allowed

Aditya Agrawal v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Apr 2023CR. MISC./5382/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a matrimonial case involving offences under Sections 498A, 147, 323, 504/34 IPC. Bail granted upon furnishing bond with sureties within six weeks subject to CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner allowed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties of like amount each within six weeks of arrest or surrender, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P

Aditya Agrawal Vs The State of Bihar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5382 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2022 Thana- BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Aditya Agrawal S/O Ajay Kumar Agrawal R/O Bijulia, Ramgarh Cantt, P.S. And Distt- Ramgarh, Jharkhand-829122.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Arpita Devi @ Arpita Kedia @ Arpita Agrawal W/o Aditya Agrawal, D/o Arjun Kedia R/o - presently Old Telephone Road, Ward no. 16, Naugacchia, P.O and P.S.- Naugacchia, Distt- Bhagalpur, Bihar.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gautam Kumar Kejriwal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 21-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, opposite

¶14

party no. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 147, 323, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the D.P. Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner never demanded dowry from the complainant nor tortured her for the same. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He submits that there is compromise in between the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5382 of 2023(3) dt.21-04-2023 2/2

¶18

parties. This fact has not been denied by the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

¶19

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

¶20

bail.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 119 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶23

devendra/-

¶24

U T

Aditya Agrawal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aditya Agrawal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rana Prasad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Devanand Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Golu Roy @ Jyotish Roy @ Jyotish Kumar Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Shishupal Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Nilofer Bano Vs The State of Bihar