The Patna High Court dismissed an application seeking quashing of an impugned order dated 27.06.2016 taking cognizance of 498A IPC/4 Dowry Act. The court found the applicant unable to provide instructions and the case stage unclear, making it the applicant availing available.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52937 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-589 Year-2016 Thana- SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
Amit Kumar Son of Nagendra Prasad Gupta, Resident of Village-Riga Mill Chowk, Police Station-Riga, District-Sitamarhi Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Pushpa Sinha, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52937 of 2017(2) dt.06-12-2023 2/2
4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act was taken. It is further submitted that much water has flown and since the petitioner has not contacted the learned counsel for the petitioner it amply demonstrates that by now the stage of the case must have changed or the trial might have been concluded.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Kundan/-
U T
Amit Kumar
The State of Bihar
Sonam Kumari
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
