The Single Judge granted the petitioner permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application after he was apprehended by police during its pendency, and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the anticipatory bail application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5222 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2022 Thana- DIDARGANJ District- Patna
======================================================
OJIR KUMAR @ BAJIR KUMAR S/O SHYAMANATH RAY R/v- Jethuli, P.S.- Nadi, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jay Ram Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
2 20-04-2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw this anticipatory bail application as the petitioner has already been apprehended by the police during pendency of this application.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
S.KUMAR/-
U T
OJIR KUMAR @ BAJIR KUMAR S/O SHYAMANATH RAY
The State of Bihar
ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
