Allowed

Amit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Nov 2023CR. MISC./51848/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner facing arrest under Sections 406 and 420 IPC over an alleged unpaid tractor purchase sought pre-arrest bail, arguing it was a civil dispute. The court relied on Bimla Tiwari and granted anticipatory bail with sureties and attendance conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted: bail-bond Rs.20,000 with two sureties of like amounts, subject to s.438(2) CrPC conditions and mandatory presence before court below on each date.

Amit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51848 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1082 Year-2022 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Amit Kumar S/O Falendra Kumar Singh R/O Village- Byapur, P.S- Maner, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mithilesh Kr. Arya For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Madhura Nand Jha ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 28-11-2023

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

¶14

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

3. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.1082 of 2022 dated 17.10.2022 registered for the offences punishable u/s 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner agreed to purchase the informant's tractor for Rs. 19 lakh and got executed the sale letter of Rs. 5,48,000/- on a non-judicial stamp paper by paying Rs. 1.15 lakh only and promised to pay the remaining

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51848 of 2023(4) dt.28-11-2023 2/3

¶19

amount. However, the total outstanding amount of Rs. 17,85,000/- was never paid to the informant despite repeated demands.

¶20

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. It is a case of civil dispute. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the judgment in the case of Bimla Tiwari Vs. State of Bihar and others (Special Leave Petition (CRL.) Nos. 834-835 of 2023) at para 10, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that "we would reiterate that the process of criminal law cannot be utilized for arm-twisting and money recovery, particularly while opposing the prayer for bail."

¶21

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶22

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Patna in connection

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51848 of 2023(4) dt.28-11-2023 3/3

¶24

with Bihta P.S. Case No.1082 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition:-

¶25

(i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

¶26

8. The application stands allowed.

¶27

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶28

atul/-

¶29

U T

Amit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Ray Vs the State of Bihar

Shamshul Imam Vs The State of Bihar

Ravindra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anand @ Anand Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Vidya Gond @ Vidyanand Gond @ Vidyanand Sah Vs The State of Bihar