Dismissed

Jitu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Aug 2023CR. MISC./51839/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed the prayer for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences of theft and criminal breach of trust. The court directed that regular bail may be considered if the petitioners surrender within four weeks. The order does not cause prejudice to the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; regular bail to be considered if surrender is made within four weeks.

Jitu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51839 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-121 Thana- DERNI BAZAR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. Jitu Kumar Son Of Nandkishore Sah, Resident Of Village- Jahangirpur, P.S.Sonpur, Distt- Saran

¶5

Dilip Sah @ Dilip Kumar Son Of Nandkishore Sah, Resident Of VillageJahangirpur, P.S.- Sonpur, Distt- Saran

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mohit Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 19-08-2023

¶9

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶10

A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Derni P.S. Case No. 113 of 2021 dated 12.07.2021, lodged under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

As per prosecution case, unknown accused persons entered into the house of the informant on 11.07.20221 at night and stole ornaments alongwith rupees 2 lac cash when the informant was sleeping with his family.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51839 of 2023(2) dt.19-08-2023 2/2

¶15

Counsel further submits that petitioners have been made accused in this case on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused and entire allegation is general and omnibus in nature.

¶16

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

¶17

bail.

¶18

Considering the nature and gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Derni P.S. Case No. 113 of 2021 to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.Ist, Saran at Chapra.

¶19

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners stands rejected.

¶20

However, the learned Court below shall consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners, if the petitioners surrender within a period of four weeks.

¶21

The present order shall not cause any prejudice to the petitioners.

¶22

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶23

ravishankar/-

¶24

U T

Jitu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Saradar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chouthi Sardar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Praveen Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar @ Guddu Halwai @ Shankar Vs The State of Bihar

Pinkesh Baswas @ Pinkesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar