Allowed

Mukul Ranjan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Feb 2023CR. MISC./5175/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous case involving misappropriation of Nal-Jal Yojana funds charged under Section 409 IPC, the Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner on the basis of his custody duration and the early stage of the trial.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Mukul Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5175 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2019 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUKUL RANJAN Son of Shrikant Sharma @ Srikant Sharma R/V- Saratha P.S- Dhaka, Dist- East champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Karandeep Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 22-02-2023

¶9

Let the defect(s), if any, pointed out by the office be removed within three weeks from the date of this order, failing which the matter be listed again under the appropriate heading for necessary action.

¶10

Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶11

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No.215 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

As per the prosecution, the informant alleged that this petitioner misappropriated the amount allotted to him under Nal-Jal Yojana to fix the supply of water in ward No.6 of Gram Panchayat Raj Karmawa and the said allotment of money was paid by two cheques.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5175 of 2023(3) dt.22-02-2023 2/4

¶14

The main submissions advanced by the learned senior counsel Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma for the petitioner are that the petitioner earlier preferred Cr. Misc. No.14336 of 2022 for the relief of Regular Bail which was rejected by this Bench vide Order dated 21.07.2022 and thereafter he has come again before this Court for the same relief mainly on three grounds: firstly, the petitioner's custody period: secondly, no progress has been made in his trial and thirdly, the informant lodged the FIR with false allegation and accordingly he has been made accused by institution of Dhaka P.S. Case No.561 of 2022 which was lodged on 06.09.2022 and not only the informant of the present matter as well as other ward members including ward secretary have also been made accused in the said case and petitioner was made scapegoat in the present matter for the alleged wrong committed by the said ward members and ward secretary etc. and moreover as per the grievance, the petitioner was simply found in the capacity of supplying construction materials in respect of Nal-Jal Scheme and the alleged wrong which has been committed by the petitioner mainly attracts a civil wrong on the part of this petitioner and there is no progress in the petitioner's trial and still charges have not been framed upon him and he has been languishing in jail since 02.12.2021 and

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5175 of 2023(3) dt.22-02-2023 3/4

¶16

against him there are criminal antecedents of four cases in which he is on bail in three cases and the nature of allegation in all the said cases including the present is same and petitioner is a proprietor of a private firm namely M/s Mukul Ranjan and had no concern to the execution of the scheme in question and the said scheme was to be executed by a committee consisting of members of the concerned ward and the alleged wrong as to non-completion of the said work was actually committed by the members of the said committee and not by this petitioner who has been falsely made accused.

¶17

Learned APP Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer.

¶18

In view of the facts, stated above, and mainly considering the petitioner's custody period and also the fact that the informant who lodged the present case has been made accused by the Panchayat Secretary of concerned Panchayat in connection with non-completion of the alleged construction work under the Nal - Jal Scheme and also considering the stage of the petitioner's case which appears to be at the initial stage, in the opinion of this Court a lenient approach can be taken in respect of the petitioner’s prayer, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand)

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5175 of 2023(3) dt.22-02-2023 4/4

¶20

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No.215 of 2019.

¶21

(Shailendra Singh, J)

¶22

sangam/- U T

Mukul Ranjan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukul Ranjan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babalu Kumar @ Balua Vs The State of Bihar

Gopal Singh @ Gopal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bablu Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Bipat Rai Vs The State of Bihar