Allowed

Satyam Choudhary v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Aug 2023CR. MISC./50731/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a cheating case. The court held that conditions for release include arrest or surrender within six weeks, furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, and abiding by Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties if arrested or surrenders within six weeks.

Satyam Choudhary Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50731 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2022 Thana- TARAPUR District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Satyam Choudhary, aged about 26 years, gender- male, son of Late Gurudas Choudhary, resident of village- Dhobai, P.S.- Tarapur, District- Munger

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 19-08-2023

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Tarapur PS Case No. 148 of 2022 dated 06.09.2022, instituted under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner is that he was identifier on the sale deed duly executed by Bibhanshu Kumar Choudhary in favour of the purchaser Faiyaz Alam.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is simply an identifier and he has nothing to do with the fraud allegedly committed by the vendor and the purchaser. Further, it is submitted that one witness of the sale deed, namely, Md. Tabrej Uddin and the purchaser, Faiaz Alam, have been granted anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50731 of 2023(2) dt.19-08-2023 2/2

¶18

vide Cr. Misc. No. 14253 of 2023 and Cr. Misc. No. 6470 of 2023 respectively. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedents.

¶19

Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶20

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM- IV, Munger, in Tarapur PS Case No. 148 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

¶21

The application stands allowed.

¶22

(Khatim Reza, J)

¶23

J. Alam/-

¶24

U T

Satyam Choudhary v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyam Choudhary v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushila Devi Vs Most.Urmila Devi and Ors.

The State Of Bihar and Anr. Vs Kaushalendra Kumar Singh and Ors.

Usha Devi and Anr. Vs Arbind Kumar Singh and Ors.

Dharmvir Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Ainul Vs the State of Bihar

Chhotu Mahto @ Chhotelal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar