Pintu Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
This bail application was rejected. The court held that given the serious nature of the allegations, including gang rape at point of pistol and recovery of a live cartridge, granting bail is not prudent. The trial court was directed to expedite proceedings.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4904 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2022 Thana- RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- Patna
======================================================
PINTU KUMAR Son of Birendra Prasad Singh R/V- Usfa Abdullahchak, P.SGaurichak, Dist- patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
3 02-05-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in a gang rape and arms offence case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pintu Kumar
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Sunil Kumar Panwar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court