Allowed

Raju Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Nov 2023CR. MISC./48345/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Anil Kumar Sinha granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Raju Kumar, who was apprehended to be arrested in connection with Sections 406, 420, and 34 IPC. The court observed he was only a witness to the alleged fraudulent transaction.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the C.J.M., Nalanda, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Raju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48345 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2021 Thana- BIHAR District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJU KUMAR son of Maheshwar Yadav Village- Baswan Bigha Ps- Bihar Dist- Nalanda

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

Amit Kumar son of Vijay Kumar Village- Kagji Bijli Colony Ps- Bihar DistNalanda P/a- Muradpur Near Lal Classes Ps- Bihar Dist- Nalanda

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rahul Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 01-11-2023

¶16

Heard the parties.

¶17

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

¶18

with Bihar P.S. Case No. 126 of 2021 dated 17-02-2021 registered under Sections 406, 420, 34 of the I.P.C.

¶19

As per the F.I.R. the petitioner is said to be a witness of an agreement for sale of a piece of land executed between the proposed seller Prem Tanti and the proposed purchaser / Amit Kumar. The allegation of the informant is that on the basis of forged identification documents the seller Prem Tanti represented the proposed purchaser i.e. informant as the owner of the land but the real owner was not informed and brought as the proposed seller.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48345 of 2023(3) dt.01-11-2023 2/2

¶22

petitioner was not aware about the details of transaction entered into between the co-accused persons and the informant but he has signed the document as a witness only.

¶23

Regard being had to the submission made by the parties, taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is not the proposed seller or broker and had signed the agreement for sale as a witness, the offence is based upon documents and there is no likelihood that the petitioner will abscond or tamper with the evidence, as such, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶24

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nalanda, Bihar Sharif in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 126 of 2021 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶25

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶26

praful/-

Raju Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Farooque and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

shambhu nath sahu @ shambhu nath sah and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Manoj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vijay Rajak @ Vijay Kumar Rajak Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Kishun Cahudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs the State of Bihar