Petitioners sought liberty to raise their points before the Trial Court in a Bhagalpur complaint case. Counsel for the petitioners requested permission; the court accorded it and disposed of the petition with that liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48288 of 2015
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2587 Year-2010 Thana- BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Najmul Hodda, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.M.K. Nirala, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
Permission accorded.
The petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid
liberty.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-Kiran
U T
Md. Iltaf Hossain Ansari @ Md. Iltaf Hussain and Ors
Md. Zahir Ahmad @ Md. Zahir Azad
Md. Nazir Ahmad @ Md.Nazir @ Nazir Ahmad
Bashir Ahmad @ Md. Bashri
Md. Najmuddin
Md. Fahimuddin @ Fahimuddin
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
