Allowed

Punam Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Aug 2023CR. MISC./47594/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving illegal mining. The petitioner, an accused in Parbatta PS Case No. 322 of 2022, was ordered to surrender within six weeks to secure release upon furnishing bail bonds with sureties under Cr.P.C. Section 438(2).

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to surrender within six weeks and furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Punam Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47594 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2022 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Punam Devi Wife of Late Ram Raksha Jha Resident of village - Sri Rampur Thuthi, P.S. - Parbatta, Distt. - Khagaria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 11-08-2023

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 322 of 2022 dated 23.07.2022 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 379, 411, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 11, 56(I)(II) Bihar Mineral And Illegals Mining Transportation Storage Rules 2019 (Amendment Rule 2021) and Section 21(4)(I) of Mines and Minerals Act, 1957 and Environment Act 15.

¶16

The prosecution case, in short, is that on 23.07.2022 at 03.10 pm, the informant along with associates, during inspection, seized two tractors bearing No. Mahindra 265 DF BR 34 G 6153 and No. Mahindra 475 DE NJTXO 1996 CE along with its trailers loaded with white sand. The trailers

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47594 of 2023(2) dt.11-08-2023 2/3

¶18

attached to the tractors did not bear any registration number. On demand, the drivers of the tractors, who are accused in this case, failed to produce e-challan or legal documents for transporting the sand. It has also been alleged that both the accused person daily transport white sand illegally from the Ganga river.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence nor anything has been recovered from her possession. The petitioner has been implicated in this case only for the reason that she is the registered owner of the trailer bearing no. BR 34 G 5410 which was attached to tractor bearing no. BR 34 J 6153. Only on the basis of that the petitioner is the owner of seized trailer, she has been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that Rajesh Roy @ Rajesh Ray, owner of one the seized tractor has been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 16.05.2023 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 15171 of 2023. Lastly, it has been submitted that petitioner has one criminal case against her.

¶20

Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47594 of 2023(2) dt.11-08-2023 3/3

¶22

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 322 of 2022, she shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶23

(Khatim Reza, J)

¶24

premchand/-

¶25

Punam Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Punam Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhawati Devi Vs Upendra Kumar Singh and Ors.

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Shakunti Devi and Ors.

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sushila Devi and Ors.

Chandan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Chandan Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Ram Narayan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar