Allowed

Hare Ram Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Sept 2023CR. MISC./46654/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving cheating and forgery. The court considered the settlement reached with stakeholders, the petitioner's fair antecedents, and his undertaking to cooperate in the investigation as grounds for release on bail upon production before the lower court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon surrender or arrest within four weeks, bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, one bailsman being own/close family member.

Hare Ram Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46654 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2023 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Hare Ram Kumar S/O Rajendra Mahto R/O Village- Khajauli, P.S- Khajauli, Distt.- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP.

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 06-09-2023

¶15

Heard Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶16

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No.68 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

Allegedly, the petitioner who happens to be operator of CSP Center, Khajauli affiliated with SBI Branch illegally withdrew excess amount of the customers deposited by them and in course of inquiry it has been found true that the petitioner has fraudulently withdrawn the excess amount from the accounts of various customers, who have been holding the Bridha Pensioner account.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46654 of 2023(2) dt.06-09-2023 2/3

¶20

petitioner submits that the occurrence took place on 09.07.2022, however, the present FIR has been lodged on 11.04.2023 and no satisfactory explanation has been given. While the petitioner was working with Sanjivani Vikash Foundation some differences had arisen which resulted into lodging of the FIR. He further submits that during the course of inquiry, when it has been found that some amount has been illegally withdrawn by the petitioner excessively, then all the stakeholders sat together and a settlement has been arrived at and in terms thereof the petitioner has already deposited the alleged excess amount in the respective account of the A/C holders. He submits that the aforesaid facts also be corroborated from the document appended to the FIR. He next submits that the petitioner is a man of fair antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the investigation or in the proceedings of the Court.

¶21

On the other hand learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that the petitioner has accepted his misdeeds and deposited the excess withdrawn amount but that cannot absolve him from his guilt.

¶22

Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the settlement arrived at amongst all the stakeholders, coupled with the fair antecedent of

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46654 of 2023(2) dt.06-09-2023 3/3

¶24

the petitioner and his undertaking, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Madhubani, in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No.68 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.

¶25

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶26

manoj/-

¶27

U T

Hare Ram Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hare Ram Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shalini John Vs Rohan Joseph Dcosta

Ajay Kumar Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Awadhesh Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlesh Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Harish Chandra Paswan Vs the State of Bihar