Allowed

Praveen Kumar Snehi @ Baua Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Aug 2023CR. MISC./46525/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge bench granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving extortion and criminal intimidation. The court was satisfied by the petitioner's clean antecedents and granted bail subject to delivering himself to the court within six weeks and furnishing a bond.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to surrender within six weeks of the order date.

Praveen Kumar Snehi @ Baua Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46525 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2023 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Praveen Kumar Snehi @ Baua Singh Son of Suresh Prasad Singh @ Suresh Prasad Singh Snehi Resident of Village -SUKHASAN, Ward No 09, Ps And Distt- Madhepura.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar BIHAR

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shekhar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 04-08-2023

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶11

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 407/2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 504, 506 and 386 of the Indian Penal Code 1860.

¶13

As per prosecution case, a call of petitioner came on informant’s mobile through mobile no.9304593213, who started using abusive words and threatened to kill the informant by describing the earning money of informant and his son. It is further alleged that the informant received several times call by the petitioner and co-accused Md. Zamal who is said to right-hand of the petitioner came at the home of the informant and made pressure on him to provide a cash of Rs.1,00,000/- to petitioner by showing pistol. It is further alleged that prior to alleged occurrence

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46525 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 2/3

¶15

the petitioner had demanded ransom of Rs.1,00,000/- from the informant.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and he has falsely been implicated in this case due to previous enmity. Petitioner is present Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Sukhasan, whereas the informant happens to be the co-villager of the petitioner and on account of Panchayat election, the informant has lodged the false and concocted case because the informant was the supporter of the rival candidate of the petitioner and the informant alongwith their family members have caste the vote in favour of rival candidate, but when the petitioner succeeded during the said Panchayat election thereafter, the informant is trying to work as a PT contract in the MANREGA Scheme and the informant demanded illegal money of Rs.3 lakh and when the petitioner refused to oblige the informant as a result of which the present case has been lodged by the informant. Occurrence took place on 18.04.2023 and FIR lodged on 26.04.2023 there is an inordinate delay of eight days in lodging the FIR without giving any sufficient explanation. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. The petitioner has earlier lodged a case against the informant alongwith his son and the present case is nothing but the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46525 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 3/3

¶18

counter blast of earlier case filed by the petitioner. In the light of aforesaid submission, no case is made out as alleged in the FIR against the petitioner.

¶19

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping in view clean antecedent of petitioner, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 407/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶22

amitkumar/-

¶23

U T

Praveen Kumar Snehi @ Baua Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Praveen Kumar Snehi @ Baua Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pali @ Jugal Ray @ Jai Kishore Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Ganesh Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Biru Mandal @ Birendra Prasad Singh @ Biran Mandal @ Virendra Prasad Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Kishun Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Amarjeet Singh Vs The State of Bihar