Allowed

Mukesh Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Dec 2023CR. MISC./45289/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 438 CrPC regarding offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC, the High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, noting he faces arrest on forged certificate allegations where no occurrence allegedly happened, subject to terms and conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on arrest or surrender within six weeks on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Mukesh Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45289 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2023 Thana- MOHAMMADPUR District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUKESH KUMAR SINGH Son of Prabhunath Singh Resident of village - Revtith, P.S. - Baikunthpur, Distt. - Gopalganj

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhakar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 11-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Petitioner is said to have got appointment as Panchayat Teacher on the basis of forged and fabricated certificates.

¶13

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced a letter dated 01.03.2023 issued by the District Programme Officer

¶14

Establishment recommending termination of 72 teachers in

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45289 of 2023(4) dt.11-12-2023 2/2

¶16

which the name of the petitioner finds place at serial number 67. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para3 of this application.

¶17

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that the termination order has already been passed by the concerned department, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Mohammadpur P.S. Case No. 08 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶19

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶20

Trivedi/-

¶21

U T

Mukesh Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nandini Kumari @ Nandani Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Niranjan Pandey Vs the State of Bihar

Radha Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar @ Subodh Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Shankar Kumar @ Shankar Yadav @ Shiv Shankar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sarfaraj Mian Vs the State of Bihar