Allowed

Sudama Chaudhary v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Aug 2023CR. MISC./45122/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by Sudama Chaudhary in a liquor smuggling case. The court granted bail on conditions, noting the recovery was from a third party, the petitioner owned the vehicle but claimed lack of knowledge, and he was ready to abide by terms.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon arrest or surrender within four weeks, subject to conditions regarding surety, attendance, and conduct.

Sudama Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45122 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-489 Year-2021 Thana- EKMA District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUDAMA CHAUDHARY Son of Tuntun Chaudhary Resident of village - Pasi Tola, Parsagarh Bazar, P.s. - Ekma, Distt. - Saran At Chapra

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Narendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 04-08-2023

¶12

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.

¶13

Sanjay Kumar who represent the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 489 of 2021 for the offence punishable under Sections 30 (a), 41 (i) (ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, lodged on 16.12.2021 by the informant Lalee Prasad.

¶15

As per the prosecution story, the police secret information caught one Munna Chaudhary and recovered 50 liters illicit country made liquor present in sack loaded in a motorcycle. Accordingly the FIR.

¶16

It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that although the motorcycle belongs to him, his friend Munna Chaudhary had taken the same and he had little

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45122 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 2/3

¶18

knowledge that the same being used for carrying illicit liquor. further he is ready to abide by all the terms and conditions.

¶19

Learned APP opposes the prayer stating that the vehicle belongs to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts/submissions put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also that the alleged recovery is from one Munna Chaudhary, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail with conditions.

¶21

Let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. District and Sessions Judge 2^nd -cum- First Exlusive Special Judge, Excise Court, Chapra, Saran, in connection with Ekma P.S. Case No. 489 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his bona fide;

¶23

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45122 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 3/3

¶25

before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

¶26

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every month till the conclusion of the trial to mark his attendance;

¶27

(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

¶28

(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶29

With the aforesaid observations, the anticipatory bail application is allowed.

¶30

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶31

Jyoti/-

¶32

U T

Sudama Chaudhary v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudama Chaudhary v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Vibha Raj Construction Vs The State of Bihar

Pravin Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Aditya Multicom Private Limited Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Aash Narayan Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Puja Arya @ Pooja Arya Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kumar Rai @ Ajay Rai Vs the State of Bihar