Petitioners sought withdrawal of their rejected second anticipatory bail application to facilitate surrender and seek bail on merits. Court permitted withdrawal with observations ensuring no prejudice.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with observation regarding subsequent surrender and merits-based bail consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45016 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-495 Year-2019 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjan Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jagdhar Prasad ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for
the petitioners, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to enable the petitioners to surrender before the court below and seek bail.
Should they so surrender before the court
below, their bail application be considered on merits without being prejudiced by the fact that the present application for second anticipatory bail has been rejected.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45016 of 2022(3) dt.21-06-2023 2/2
Dismissed as withdrawn with the observation
aforesaid.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
rishi/-
U T
Ram Pravesh Rai @ Ram Pravesh Ray
Baidynath Rai @ Baidhnath Ray
The State of Bihar
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
