Allowed

Rohit Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jul 2023CR. MISC./44159/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a liquor procurement case instituted u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties after the framing of charges.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Court below after framing of charge.

Rohit Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44153 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2023 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PRAMOD KUMAR PASWAN @ PRAMOD PASWAN son of Sitaram Paswan Village- Chaksaid Ps- Rajapakar (Baranti OP) Dist- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shanti Bhushan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sucheta Yadav ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 21-07-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

As per prosecution case, there has been recovery of

¶15

807.12 liters of illegal foreign made liquor from a hut.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner has apprehended on spot. He submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor and the place of occurrence does not belongs to the petitioner. No incriminating article has recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He is languishing in

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44153 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 2/2

¶18

judicial custody since 13.06.2023.

¶19

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

¶20

for the State.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail after framing of charge . The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 206 of 2023.

¶22

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶23

arish/-

¶24

U T

Rohit Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Upendra Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Rashid Ali @ Md. Rashid Ali @ Md. Wajib Vs The State of Bihar

Jairam Tanti Vs The State of Bihar

Mandrika Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Manjhi @ Bhundi Manjhi @ Bundi Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Moim @ Md. Moem @ Md. Moyeen Vs The State of Bihar