Allowed

Vikash Kumar @ Vikki Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jan 2023CR. MISC./43390/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving extortion, attempt to murder, and illegal possession of firearms. The court directed release upon furnishing sureties, subject to standard conditions of appearance and bond cancellation on default.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Vikash Kumar @ Vikki Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43390 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2018 Thana- TATARPUR District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vikash Kumar @ Vikki Paswan, Son Of Munilal Paswan, Resident Of Village - Railway Colony Barari, P.S.- Barari, District - Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 25-01-2023

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks.

¶15

In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Tatarpur P.S. Case No. 260 of 2018 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 386, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶16

As per prosecution case, three miscreants threatened the informant and demanded Rs. 2-3 lacs as extortion money. When the informant opposed, one of the miscreants opened fire and the shot hit the informant in his right chest. Informant named co-accused Kapil Yadav, who demanded extortion money three years back. During investigation, the name of the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43390 of 2022(4) dt.25-01-2023 2/3

¶18

petitioner transpired as one of the miscreants.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has been named in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Kailash Yadav. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner or at his instance. Learned counsel further submits that the allegation of opening fire is against co-accused Pappu Mishra. Other co-accused, namely, Kailash Yadav and Pappu Mishra have been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.06.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38757 of 2019 and order dated 17.10.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 64356 of 2019, respectively. The petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2022 and the charge-sheet has been submitted in this case.

¶20

Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail submitting that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent and allegation against him is quite serious.

¶21

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the lack of substantive material against the petitioner to connect him with the offence as alleged and further considering the period of

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43390 of 2022(4) dt.25-01-2023 3/3

¶23

custody of the petitioner along with submission of charge-sheet against him, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII, Bhagalpur in connection with Tatarpur P.S. Case No. 260 of 2018, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also the following conditions :

¶24

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶25

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶26

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶27

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶28

balmukund/-

¶29

U T

Vikash Kumar @ Vikki Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Kumar @ Vikki Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Sharma @ Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Binod Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Prasad @ Chandan Prasad Akela Vs the State of Bihar

Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Malik Vs the State of Bihar

Raman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar