Allowed

Dilip Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC8 May 2023CR. MISC./4321/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three petitioners in judicial custody sought bail in a robbery case. They claimed false implication via investigation confessions. The High Court granted bail on ₹10,000 bond with conditions regarding cooperation, evidence tampering, and disclosure of criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each subject to conditions of cooperation in trial and no tampering with evidence or witnesses.

Dilip Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Property and Title | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56083 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-317 Year-2022 Thana- GARDANIBAG District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ADITYA KUMAR @ KALLU son of Raj Kishore Chaudhary Resident of Village- Jahidpur, Police Station- Punpun, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

with

¶11

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4321 of 2023

¶12

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-317 Year-2022 Thana- GARDANIBAG District- Patna

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Dilip Kumar Son Of Suresh Saw @ Suresh Soni R/O Mohalla- Rajapul, Indira Nagar, P.S.- S.K. Puri, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶19

======================================================

¶20

with

¶21

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 6725 of 2023

¶22

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-317 Year-2022 Thana- GARDANIBAG District- Patna

¶23

======================================================

¶24

Kundan Kumar Son Of Kailash Chandrabanshi @ Kailash Ram @ Kailash Prasad R/O Village- Rjapur Anandpuri, P.S.- Krishnapuri, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶29

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 56083 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, A.P.P. (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4321 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Asha Devi, A.P.P. (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 6725 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, A.P.P.

¶30

======================================================

¶31

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA

¶32

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56083 of 2022(3) dt.08-05-2023 2/4

¶33

ORAL ORDER

¶34

3 08-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶35

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶36

Petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since 12.07.2022 in connection with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 317 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 03.06.2022 for the offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶37

According to prosecution case, in brief, is that the informant namely, Raghunath Prasad has alleged that on 03.06.2022 at about 1:00 P.M. five criminals on two motorcycles entered his jewelery shop (Mahalaxmi Jwellers) with arms and started warning to kill him and took five boxes of gold and silver, Nosal pin (nak-besar) of silver, some old articles of repaired. On alarm the accused persons started to flee away and the aforesaid five boxes fell down on the road from the possession of the accused and the same were recovered by the informant. It is further alleged that accused persons left a black colour Honda Shine motorcycle also on the road.

¶38

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. and the name of these petitioners have been transpired during investigation on the basis of confessional

¶39

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56083 of 2022(3) dt.08-05-2023 3/4

¶40

statement of co-accused person and self confessional statement of these petitioners. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession or the house of the petitioners except the seven silver coins was recovered from the conscious possession of petitioner namely, Aditya Kumar @ Kallu and till date no TIP has been conducted by the prosecution with respect to recovered article. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against these petitioners and the petitioners are in judicial custody since 12.07.2022.

¶41

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners on the ground that petitioners carries one criminal antecedent other than the present one.

¶42

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 317 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:-

¶43

Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically

¶44

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56083 of 2022(3) dt.08-05-2023 4/4

¶45

present as directed by the court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶46

If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶47

And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶48

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶49

mdrashid/-

¶50

U T

Dilip Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

MD Wasir Alam @ Md. Basir Alam Vs the State of Bihar

Baboo Saheb @ Baboo Saheb Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Ram @ Raju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mahendra Paswan @ Khalifa Paswan @ Mani Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Lucky Vs the State of Bihar

Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar