Allowed

Tirloki Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jul 2023CR. MISC./42011/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case related to the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The court ordered release after framing of charge, imposing conditions including cooperation in trial and maintenance of bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail after framing of charge subject to furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with sureties and satisfying specified conditions.

Tirloki Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42011 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-681 Year-2021 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

TIRLOKI PRASAD SON OF ROOP LAL MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DHARHARA, PO JHURJHURI, PS-BARKATTHA DIST HAZARIBAGH JHARKHAND.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar BIHAR

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vikas Ratan Bharti For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 21-07-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nawada (Nagar) P.S. Case No. 681/2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 33, 34 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

As per prosecution case, husband of the informant Omprakash Prasad @ Prakash Singh @Lota Singh died on account of consumption of spurious liquor. It is further alleged that he has purchased the said liquor from some unknown person.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to local politics. The petitioner is not named in the FIR

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42011 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 2/3

¶17

and the name of petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Kartik Kumar @ Kartik Chaudhary. Except confessional statement, there is nothing on record to demonstrate the complicity of the present petitioner with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has been remanded in this case from Nawada Sadar P.S. Case No. 372/2021 on 06.02.2023 and since then he is languishing in jail custody. The petitioner bears criminal antecedent of 20 cases. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. On similar allegation co-accused Kaushal Yadav has already been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No.7732/2023 and the case of present petitioner stands on similar footing.

¶18

The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner has 20 criminal antecedents.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, co-accused has already been granted bail, charge sheet has already been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42011 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 3/3

¶21

evidence, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Judge-1st, Nawada in connection with Nawada (Nagar) P.S. Case No. 681/2021, subject to following conditions:-

¶22

(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

¶23

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

¶24

(iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶25

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶26

amitkumar/-

¶27

U T

Tirloki Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tirloki Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Joshi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar @ Morabba Vs The State of Bihar

Vikki Kumar @ Biki Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar