Allowed

Bhulla @ Randhir @ Bhullu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jul 2023CR. MISC./41963/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an FIR involving assault and attempted murder charges, directing furnishing of a bond with sureties and permission to rectify police station defects within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount; permitted to remove defects within four weeks; application allowed.

Bhulla @ Randhir @ Bhullu Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41963 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2021 Thana- SALIMPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BHULLA @ RANDHIR @ BHULLU SON OF OM SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SAMMATPUR POLICE STATION SALIMPUR DIST PATNA

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Musowir For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 25-07-2023

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Salimpur P.S. Case No. 115 of 2021 dated 14.8.2021 registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and u/s 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41963 of 2023(2) dt.25-07-2023 2/3

¶14

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have fired on the informant and his father causing injuries to them.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Nothing incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is land dispute between the parties. The co-accused person has already been granted bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.3.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41599 of 2022. The petitioner is accused in two other criminal cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 4.3.2023.

¶16

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Barh, Patna in connection with Salimpur P.S. Case

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41963 of 2023(2) dt.25-07-2023 3/3

¶19

No. 115 of 2021.

¶20

The application stands allowed.

¶21

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶22

Ajay Singh/-

¶23

U T

Bhulla @ Randhir @ Bhullu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhulla @ Randhir @ Bhullu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.P. Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ravindra Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Tasir Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Gajanand Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Mahendra Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Lalu Kumar @ Lalu Tanti Vs The State of Bihar