Raju Sharma v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
On a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in a murder case, the Single Judge rejected the prayer, finding no case made out given the serious offence and prosecution material.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected with direction to surrender within 6 weeks.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41883 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2021 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia
======================================================
Raju Sharma S/O Wakil Sharma @ Wakil Das Resident Of Village- Tatma Toli Shanti Niketan Hata,P.S.- K. Hat District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bhola Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raju Sharma
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Chandra Prakash Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court