Allowed

Harendra Kumar @ Harendra Rajwar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Jul 2023CR. MISC./4152/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought regular bail in a murder case alleging he killed the informant's husband and hid the body; no eye witness or recovery was pointed out and he had no criminal antecedent. Considering the facts and custody period, the court enlarged him on bail with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount each before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

Harendra Kumar @ Harendra Rajwar Vs The State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4152 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2021 Thana- AGRER District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Harendra Kumar @ Harendra Rajwar Son of Gyan Chandra Rajwar @ Ram Chandra Rajwar Resident of Village- Kunwa, P.S.- Agrer, District- Rohtas

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ===================	... ... Opposite Party/s ===================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :	Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary
For the Opposite Party/s : ===================	Mr.Satyendra Prasad ===================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 04-07-2023

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

As per prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is that he had committed murder of the informant’s husband and thrown the dead body of the deceased at southern side of village in badhar in order to hide the evidence.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion. There is no eye witness of the alleged occurrence and during course of investigation no consistent material has come to show the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4152 of 2023(3) dt.04-07-2023 2/2

¶16

occurrence. Nothing incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 27.08.2022.

¶17

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Agrer P.S. Case No. 23 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶19

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶20

lata/- U T

Harendra Kumar @ Harendra Rajwar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harendra Kumar @ Harendra Rajwar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satyendra Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Narayan Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Sajan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Aryan Pathak Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar @ Doma Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar