Allowed

Abhay Yadav @ Govind Yadav @ Abhay Jee @ Govind Jee v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jul 2023CR. MISC./41466/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in judicial custody since 2018 for offences registered in 2019, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing security of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya.

Abhay Yadav @ Govind Yadav @ Abhay Jee @ Govind Jee Vs The… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41466 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2019 Thana- LUTUA District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Abhay Yadav @ Govind Yadav @ Abhay Jee @ Govind Jee Son of Kuldeep Yadav Resident of Village- Ban Manjhauli, PS- Dhibra, District- Aurangabad.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Jubair Ansari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 21-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶9

learned APP for the State.

¶10

The petitioner is languishing in custody in a

¶11

case registered for the offences punishable under

¶12

Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307, 120(B)A, 121, 122, 124(A) of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 16, 18, 20 of the U.A.P Act.

¶13

The prosecution case as per F.I.R is that on receiving information that extremists are planning to commit some offence, raid was laid when firing was resorted to by both sides. The police, thereafter

¶14

recovered huge arms and ammunition.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41466 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 2/2

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

¶17

petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 28.02.2018 whereas the present F.I.R was registered on 15.05.2019 which itself shows that petitioner was falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 28.02.2018.

¶18

Considering the facts aforesaid and the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya/concerned court in connection with Lutua P.S. Case No. 05 of 2019.

¶19

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶20

Shageer/-

¶21

U T

Abhay Yadav @ Govind Yadav @ Abhay Jee @ Govind Jee v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhay Yadav @ Govind Yadav @ Abhay Jee @ Govind Jee v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Upendra Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Rashid Ali @ Md. Rashid Ali @ Md. Wajib Vs The State of Bihar

Jairam Tanti Vs The State of Bihar

Mandrika Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Manjhi @ Bhundi Manjhi @ Bundi Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Moim @ Md. Moem @ Md. Moyeen Vs The State of Bihar