The High Court at Patna accorded permission to the petitioner to withdraw his criminal miscellaneous application, resulting in the dismissal of the proceeding as withdrawn. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39844 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2022 Thana- NAYAGAON District- Saran
======================================================
KALU RAY @ BINOD RAY @ KALLU RAY son of Ramji Ray VillageParmanandpur Ps- Parmanandpur Dist- Saran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Saket Anand For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 22-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P for the State.
4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
atul/-
U T
Kalu Ray @ Binod Ray @ Kallu Ray
The State of Bihar
Chandra Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
