Suspends appeal and stops proceedings in writ petition challenging High Court order granting anticipatory bail. Discloses amendment in order to specify conditions for bail bond.
Appeal/suspension proceedings stayed; original bail order amended to specify bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39809 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2022 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39809 of 2023(3) dt.18-08-2023 2/2
submits that the F.I.R. was lodged on 20.04.2022, but the F.I.R. was send to the learned Court below on 23.04.2023, after inordinate delay of three days. Petitioner no. 1 has one criminal antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has three criminal antecedents as mentioned in the supplementary affidavit.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
anand/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail given the lack of specific overt acts and inordinate delay in filing the FIR.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hare Ram Yadav
Radhe Yadav
The State of Bihar
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
