Allowed

Shashi Kumar @ Shashishekhar Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Jul 2023CR. MISC./38859/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court enhanced the bail application of a petitioner accused under Section 21(C) of the NDPS Act. The court granted bail on conditions including furnishing bonds, attending court/interrogation, and not inducing witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail with bonds of Rs. 10,000 each for himself and two sureties, subject to conditions of availability and non-interference.

Shashi Kumar @ Shashishekhar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38859 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2023 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shashi Kumar @ Shashishekhar Prasad Son Of Sri Brij Mohan Lal Resident Of Village- Hospital Road, Bhawdepur,Ward No. 14, Ps.- Sitamarhi, DisttSitamarhi

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 07-07-2023

¶12

Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioner and Ld. APP

¶13

for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 111 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Section 21(C) of the NDPS Act.

¶15

As per allegation, 28.8 litres of TRIOREX cough

¶16

syrup were recovered from a motorcycle.

¶17

Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the alleged recovery has not been made as per the procedure as prescribed under NDPS

¶18

Act. He also submits that alleged contraband has not been

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38859 of 2023(2) dt.07-07-2023 2/4

¶20

recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

¶21

He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 18.02.2023.

¶22

It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

¶23

It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one.

¶24

However, Ld. APP for the State vehemently

¶25

opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail.

¶26

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

¶27

this application is allowed , directing the petitioner, abovenamed, to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ld. concerned Trial Court in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 111

¶28

of 2023, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on the following conditions:

¶29

(i) The petitioner will make himself available for

¶30

interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required.

¶31

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38859 of 2023(2) dt.07-07-2023 3/4

¶32

(ii) The petitioner will undertake that

¶33

investigation/trial will not hamper on account of his absence or non-cooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required.

¶34

(iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly

¶35

make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.

¶36

(iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

¶37

(v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶38

Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove

¶39

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38859 of 2023(2) dt.07-07-2023 4/4

¶40

all the defects, if any, pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.

¶41

(Jitendra Kumar, J)

¶42

ashishkr/-

¶43

U T

Shashi Kumar @ Shashishekhar Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shashi Kumar @ Shashishekhar Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Sharma Vs the State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar @ Bojha Vs the State of Bihar

Shubham Chaurasiya Vs the State of Bihar

Pappu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Tanti Vs The State of Bihar