This is an oral order where the petitioner failed to appear on multiple dates despite repeated calls. The court concluded the petitioner was not interested and dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38852 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2021 Thana- OBRA District- Aurangabad
======================================================
SINDHU KUMARI W/O RAMSEWAK SINGH R/O Village Kothiya, P.S. Obra, Dist. Aurangabad, at present R/O Village Tendua, Batkera, P.S. Obra, Dist. Aurangabad
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mohammed Arif ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
In spite of repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of
4 03-11-2023 the petitioner.
had appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
prosecution.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
Trivedi/-
U T
Sindhu Kumari W/o Ramsewak Singh
The State of Bihar
Anand Kumar S/o Ram Iqbal Yadav
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
