The Patna High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition for default. The court found that the petitioners were absent despite prior cautioning, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38851 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1776 Year-2016 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar 3, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
5 13-12-2023 Nobody is present on behalf of the Petitioner despite
repeated calls.
the last date, nobody was present on behalf of the Petitioner to attend the matter and the Petitioner was cautioned to attend the matter on the next date of hearing. Despite such cautioning, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38851 of 2016(5) dt.13-12-2023 2/2
Petitioner is not present to attend the matter, which shows that the Petitioner has lost interest to pursue the present case.
(Jitendra Kumar, J)
shoaib/-
U T
Ramneek Teng
Obaed Hussan Khan
State Of Bihar
Anil Kumar Singh
Jitendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
