Allowed

Renu Devi @ Seema Kumari v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Aug 2023CR. MISC./38197/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to a female accused in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case filed by her husband. The court held that the accused could be released on personal bond of Rs.10,000 with conditions, allowing for potential future remand.

What did the court decide?

Applicant ordered to be released on bail upon arrest by executing personal bond of Rs.10,000 with one surety on specified conditions.

Renu Devi @ Seema Kumari Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38197 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2020 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Renu Devi @ Seema Kumari W/O Santosh Kumar, R/O Village- Narga Bajrangbali Temple, PS. Karpi, Dist.-Arwal.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

Sri Gajendra Kumar S/O Late Devlakhan Singh, R/O village- Nadiyawan, PS.- Kako, Distt.- Jehanabad.

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance:

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rudal Singh, Advocate For the Complainant/s : Mr. Satyanand Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 04-08-2023

¶14

This application is filed under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for enlarging the applicant on anticipatory bail in connection with Jehanabad Complaint Case No. 286 of 2020, dated 23.09.2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 120 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Heard Mr. Rudal Singh, the learned advocate for the applicant, Mr. Satyanand Sharma, the learned advocate for the complainant and Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, the learned APP for respondent-State.

¶16

Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the nature of allegations are such for which custodial

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38197 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 2/5

¶18

interrogation at this stage is not necessary. He further submits that the applicant will keep herself available during the course of investigation, trial also and will not flee from justice.

¶19

Learned advocate for the applicant on instructions states that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions including imposition of conditions with regard to powers of Investigating Agency to file an application before the competent Court for his remand. He further submits that upon filing of such application by the Investigating Agency, the right of applicant accused to oppose such application on merits may be kept open. Learned advocate, therefore, submitted that considering the above facts, the applicant may be granted anticipatory bail.

¶20

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of anticipatory bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

¶21

Having heard the learned advocates for the parties and perusing the material placed on record and taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, gravity of offences, role attributed to the accused, without discussing the evidence in detail, at this stage, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38197 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 3/5

¶23

This Court has considered following aspects:

¶24

(i) it is contended by learned counsel for the

¶25

applicant that applicant is a lady accused and prima facie the ingredients of alleged offence is punishable under Section 406 and 420 of IPC are not made out against her;

¶26

(ii) it is also submitted that applicant is not signatory to the documents in question nor she had identified the signature of any of the witnesses/the person who had signed the documents, merely because the applicant is the wife of original accused no. 1, she has been falsely implicated.

¶27

This Court has also taken into consideration the

¶28

law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. , reported at (2011) 1 SCC 694 , wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in the case of Shri Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab , reported at (1980) 2 SCC 565 .

¶29

Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is ordered to be released on bail in the event of her arrest in connection with Jehanabad Complaint Case No. 286 of 2020, on her executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

¶30

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38197 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 4/5

¶31

Thousand Only) with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, on the following conditions:

¶32

(a) shall cooperate with the investigation and make herself available for interrogation, whenever required;

¶33

(b) shall remain present at concerned Police Station on 25^th August, 2023 between 11:00 AM and 02:00 PM;

¶34

(c) shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;

¶35

(d) shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and not play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

¶36

(e) shall not leave India without the permission of the concerned trial court and, if having passport, shall deposit the same before the concerned trial court within a week; and

¶37

(f) it would be open to the Investigating Officer to file an application for remand if he considers it proper and just and the competent Court would decide it on merits;

¶38

Despite this order, it would be open for the Investigating Agency to apply to the competent Court, for police

¶39

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38197 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 5/5

¶40

remand of the applicant. The applicant shall remain present before the competent Court on the first date of hearing of such application and on all subsequent occasions, as may be directed by the competent Court. This would be sufficient to treat the accused in the judicial custody for the purpose of entertaining application of the prosecution for police remand. This is, however, without prejudice to the right of the accused to seek stay against an order of remand, if, ultimately, granted, and the power of the competent Court to consider such a request in accordance with law. It is clarified that the applicant, even if, remanded to the police custody, upon completion of such period of police remand, shall be set free immediately, subject to other conditions of this anticipatory bail order.

¶41

At the trial, the concerned trial court shall not be influenced by the prima facie observations made by this Court in the present order.

¶42

This application is, accordingly, allowed.

¶43

Shahnawaz/-

¶44

U T

Renu Devi @ Seema Kumari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Renu Devi @ Seema Kumari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Ram @ Bishu Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Sk. Munif Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Das @Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dilkhush Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Salauddin @ Md. Salahuddin Vs the State of Bihar