Allowed

Mahboob Rehman v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Feb 2023CR. MISC./37652/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners facing kidnapping and related charges, allowing release upon arrest if bail bonds and sureties were furnished within a specified period.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on anticipatory bail upon arrest within six weeks, conditioned on furnishing Rs. 25,000 bail bonds with two sureties of similar amount.

Mahboob Rehman Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37652 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2021 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MAHBOOB REHMAN Son of Jubaid Rehman @ Humaid Rehman Resident of Village-Chandpatti, Ward No.-13, P.S.-Sursand, DistrictSitamarhi (Bihar).

¶5

Jubaid Rehman @ Humaid Rehman Son of Late Gaffar Rehman Resident of Village-Chandpatti, Ward No.-13, P.S.-Sursand, District-Sitamarhi (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 16-02-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks.

¶15

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 372, 363, 366(a), 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

¶16

Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with others co-accused persons kidnapped the daughter of the informant for selling her or for illicit purpose.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37652 of 2022(3) dt.16-02-2023 2/2

¶19

petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that after investigation police has filed final form against the petitioners but the learned Court below differed the final form and taken cognizance against the petitioners. He submits that the statement of the victim was recorded u/S 164 Cr.P.C in which she was not supported the prosecution case. He further submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

¶20

Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No.37/2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶22

ajay/-

¶23

U T

Mahboob Rehman v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahboob Rehman v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Kumar @ Satyendra Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Sushil Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Sanjay Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ankit Ojha Vs The State of Bihar